Complex Endogenous Growth Model and Its Applications

Robert Kitt

Abstract


In this paper, social complex systems are applied to the endogenous economic growth model. It is discussed that the economic growth put forward in Romer’s endogenous growth model is not continuous, but is rather in the functional shape of the bifurcations known to the natural sciences. The author has proposed that the level of development (factor A in a classic growth model) should be the superposition of the structures of science and real economy in the observed country. The conclusion is drawn that closer correspondence between business and R&D results in (i) higher economic output for the country; and (ii) a greater resilience to external shocks. This is especially important for small open economies with distinct cultures and languages (e.g. Estonia), that should simultaneously increase its citizens well-being, but must account for exogenous economic and technological factors. It is concluded that under the assumptions of complexity, a state’s economic growth model should (i) strive for horizontally and vertically diversified risks, as well as (ii) assume that none of its society’s members is left behind in terms of education, employment, and general wellbeing.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aghion, P., Akcigit, U. and Howitt, P. 2013. What do we learn from Schumpeterian growth theory? No. w18824. National Bureau of Economic Research.

Albert, R. and Barabasi, A.-L. 2002. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 74, pp. 47-97.

Arrow, K.J. 1962. The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing. The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 155-173.

Axtell, R, 2001. Zipf Distribution of U.S. Firm Sizes. Science, Vol. 293, pp. 1818-1820.

Barabasi, A.-L., and Albert, R. 1999. Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks. Science 286, pp. 509-512.

Durlauf, S.N. 2012. Complexity, economics, and public policy. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 11(1), pp.45-75.

Elsner, W. 2015. Policy Implications of Economic Complexity and Complexity Economics. Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/68372/. MPRA Paper No. 68372, posted 15. December 2015

Engelbrecht, J. 2010. Komplekssüsteemid. Akadeemia, No. 8, pp. 1347-1362.

Foray, D., David, P.A. and Bronwyn, H. H. 2011. Smart Specialisation. MTEI.

Foxon, T.J., Köhler, J., Michie, J. and Oughton, C. 2013. Towards a new complexity economics for sustainability. Cambridge journal of economics, 37(1), pp. 187-208.

Gabaix, X. 2016. Power Laws in Economics: An Introduction. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 30, No 1, pp. 185–206.

Howitt, P. 2007. Innovation, Competition and Growth: A Schumpeterian Perspective on Canada’s Economy, C.D. Howe Instituted Commentary, www.cdhowe.org, No. 246.

Karo, E., Kanep, H., Ukrainski, K., Kattel, R., Varblane, U., Lember, V. 2014. Nutikas spetsialiseerumine: kas Eesti teadus-, arendus- ja innovatsioonipoliitika kuldvõtmeke aastail 2014-2020. Riigikogu toimetised.

Kitt, R. 2005. Doctoral thesis. Generalised scale invariance in financial time series. Tallinn University of Technology.

Kitt, R. 2014a. Eesti majanduse visioon: hajutatud riskide ja vähese vaesusega. Akadeemia, No. 26, pp. 451-473.

Kitt, R. 2014b. Economic Decision Making: Application of the Theory of Complex Systems. In Banerjee, S. (e.). Chaos Theory in Politics, pp. 51-73. Springer Netherlands.

Lancaster, K. 1971. Consumer Demand – A new approach. New York: Columbia University press.

Lucas, R.E., Jr. 1988. On the Mechanics of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary Economics, July 1988, 22:1, 3-42.

Mantegna, R.N. and Stanley, H.E. 2000. An introduction to econophysics: correlation and complexity in finance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.

Miller, J.H. and Page, S.E. 2009. Complex adaptive systems: An introduction to computational models of social life. Princeton university press.

Mitchell, M. 2011. Complexity: A Guided Tour. Oxford University Press.

OECD. 2013. Innovation-driven Growth in Regions: The Role of Smart Specialisation.

Pareto, V. 1896-1897. Cours d’Économie Politique. Professé a l’Université de Lausanne. Vol. I, 1896; Vol. II, 1897.

Popper, K.R. 1945. Open Society and Its Enemies. London: Routledge

Puu, T. 1989. Nonlinear Economic Dynamics. In Nonlinear Economic Dynamics (pp. 1-7). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Puu, T. 2013. Attractors, Bifurcations, and Chaos: Nonlinear Phenomena in Economics. Springer Science & Business Media.

Puu, T. 2015. Arts, Sciences, and Economics: A Historical Safari. 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Rawls, J. 2001. Justice as fairness: A restatement. Harvard University Press.

Romer, D. 2012. Advanced Macroeconomics, 4th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Romer, P.M. 1986. Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. Journal of Political Economy, October 1986, 94:5, pp. 1002-37.

Stanley, H. E., Plerou, V. and Gabaix, X. 2008. A Statistical Physics View of Financial Fluctuations: Evidence for Scaling and Universality. Physica A 387, pp. 3967-3981.

Takayasu, H., (Ed.) 2013. Empirical Science of Financial Fluctuations: The Advent of Econophysics. Springer Science & Business Media.

Tacchella, A., Cristelli, M., Caldarelli, G., Gabrielli, A. and Pietronero, L. 2013. Economic complexity: Conceptual grounding of a new metrics for global competitiveness. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 37, Issue 8, pp. 1683–1691.

Varblane, U. 2012. Targa spetsialiseerumise käsitlus ja selle kasutamisvõimalused Eesti TAI strateegia ja ettevõtluspoliitika kujundamisel. TIPS.

Zipf, G.K. 1949. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. Addison-Wesley, Cambridge